When mental health plays a role in a legal case, the court may require a formal assessment to gain objective insight into an individual’s psychological functioning. A court-ordered psychological evaluation, also known as a mental health evaluation for court, is designed to answer specific legal questions, such as competency, risk, or parental fitness, through evidence-based psychological testing and clinical expertise.
Dr. Savana Howe is a licensed clinical psychologist with extensive experience in conducting forensic and high-stakes psychological assessments. She works with individuals, attorneys, and court systems across Phoenix and surrounding areas to deliver evaluations that are both clinically sound and legally compliant. Her approach prioritizes objectivity, discretion, and accuracy, with every report designed to meet court standards and provide clear, actionable information for legal decision-making.
A court-ordered psychological evaluation is a formal, structured mental health assessment required by a judge or legal authority. These evaluations are used in legal proceedings to provide an objective understanding of a person’s psychological functioning. They are often requested to assist in determining mental health diagnoses, behavioral patterns, or cognitive abilities relevant to the case.
Unlike therapy, these evaluations are not confidential and are not intended for treatment purposes. Instead, they are conducted with the specific goal of answering legal questions—such as assessing emotional stability, fitness to parent, or mental competency—through objective tools, clinical interviews, and evidence-based methods.For example, a judge may request an evaluation to assess whether a parent involved in a custody case is psychologically fit to care for a child, or to determine whether a defendant in a criminal case is competent to stand trial.
Dr. Howe brings deep experience in forensic psychological evaluations, providing legally compliant reports and clear findings that assist courts, attorneys, and other professionals in reaching informed decisions
Courts may request a psychological evaluation in specific legal contexts where mental health plays a central role. These assessments are often used to guide decisions in both civil and criminal cases, as well as family law. Each evaluation is tailored to answer the legal questions presented in the case.
In family court, evaluations may be ordered to assess each parent’s emotional stability, parenting style, and ability to meet their child’s developmental and psychological needs. These evaluations help inform decisions about custody arrangements and visitation, especially when there are concerns about mental health, conflict, or safety.
In criminal cases, courts may require an evaluation to determine whether a defendant is mentally capable of understanding the charges against them and participating in their own defense. A person must be found competent in order for the legal process to continue.
These evaluations assess whether a mental illness may have influenced a person’s behavior during an alleged crime. This is often tied to an insanity defense or used to inform sentencing decisions, particularly when there are signs of severe psychiatric symptoms or impaired judgment.
Focuses on identifying psychiatric, mood, or personality disorders that may influence legal behavior, decision-making, or culpability.
In civil matters involving vulnerable adults or individuals with cognitive impairments, evaluations help determine whether someone is capable of managing their personal, financial, or medical affairs. The results are used to guide decisions about appointing a guardian or conservator.
The evaluation process is designed to be clear, legally focused, and professionally guided. Each step ensures that the assessment is thorough, objective, and compliant with court expectations.
The process begins with a one-on-one meeting between Dr. Howe and the referred individual or legal representative. This consultation helps clarify the court’s referral question, review any relevant legal or case documents, and outline the scope and expectations of the evaluation.
2
Dr. Howe conducts structured clinical interviews and uses standardized psychological tests to assess emotional functioning, personality traits, and mental health conditions. When appropriate, she may also interview family members or third parties to gain broader context.
3
Relevant legal, medical, academic, or criminal history records are thoroughly reviewed and integrated into the assessment. This step ensures findings are grounded in both clinical evidence and real-world documentation.
4
Dr. Howe prepares a detailed, court-ready written report that addresses the legal referral questions, includes DSM-5 diagnoses (if applicable), and outlines evidence-based recommendations.
Dr. Savana Howe is a licensed clinical psychologist with a strong specialization in psychological testing and evaluation. She provides comprehensive, evidence-based assessments across a wide range of areas, including ADHD, Autism, learning differences, giftedness, cognitive functioning, court-ordered evaluations, and fitness-for-duty assessments.
Dr. Howe is highly regarded for her ability to deliver clear, detailed, and actionable reports that assist in diagnostic clarification, treatment planning, legal proceedings, and educational or occupational accommodations. Her expertise spans diverse environments, including family and criminal courts, aviation, healthcare systems, and school settings. Every evaluation is thoughtfully tailored to the individual’s needs and conducted with cultural sensitivity, clinical precision, and an emphasis on real-world application.
In addition to her testing services, Dr. Howe also offers therapeutic support for individuals facing anxiety, depression, trauma, and major life transitions, maintaining a compassionate, client-centered approach across all areas of her work.
Court-ordered psychological evaluations can be requested by a variety of legal authorities and related professionals when mental health information is needed to assist in decision-making. Common sources of referral include:
A judge may order an evaluation during family, criminal, or civil proceedings to better understand an individual’s mental health status in relation to the case.
Both defense and prosecuting attorneys may request an evaluation to support arguments related to competency, criminal responsibility, or mitigation during sentencing.
Sometimes, healthcare providers involved in legal cases may recommend a formal psychological evaluation to clarify mental health diagnoses or guide treatment planning related to legal issues.
When overseeing individuals under supervision, officers may seek evaluations to assess mental health needs, risk factors, or compliance with court-mandated treatment.
In custody or divorce proceedings, family law attorneys and courts often seek evaluations to assess parenting capacity, emotional stability, or child safety concerns.
In cases involving child welfare, mental health evaluations can provide critical information regarding a parent’s ability to provide safe and appropriate care.
Contact Dr. Howe today to schedule your free 15-minute consultation and begin your journey toward better mental health.
The timeline can vary depending on the complexity of the referral and the type of evaluation requested. In general:
Dr. Howe is committed to balancing thoroughness with timely delivery, particularly for cases with legal deadlines.
It’s helpful to bring any relevant legal or medical records, and be ready to discuss your background and current situation honestly. Being cooperative, open, and respectful during the process supports a more accurate and fair evaluation.
Refusing to participate in a court-ordered psychological evaluation can lead to legal consequences. Because these evaluations are mandated by the court, non-compliance may be interpreted as contempt of court or as a lack of cooperation. Depending on the type of case, this could result in unfavorable rulings—such as loss of custody or visitation rights in family court, delays or dismissals in criminal proceedings, ineligibility for diversion or treatment programs, or other penalties determined by the judge. The court may proceed with decisions based on limited or one-sided information if an evaluation is not completed.
Copyright © 2025 Dr. Howe Psychology – All Rights Reserved.
